Hillary Will Be A President Who Stands Up for Americans
Hillary explains her belief that to be the President for all Americans means respecting all Americans. Video has coments by Hillary about Barack Hussein Obama's statement about small town America
HILLARY 2008,we will not settle for les!
posted by Randy Calypso @ Tuesday, April 15, 2008
7 comments
7 Comments:
Please tell me what you think of this? Is it a viable argument?
The L.A. Times references a poll saying that a majority in Penn, Indiana & N.C. believe "superdelegates should back whichever candidate won the popular vote in the superdelegate's state", not necessarily just for whoever wins the overall popular vote. It would radically redraw the superdelegate picture, possibly in favor of Hillary, handing here the superdelegate votes from California, New York, Texas, Ohio & other big states. Can we help Hillary take this to the hoop?
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/04/lat-pollrev-wri.html
-Snoop
Hilliary Clinon is a best candidate for President .
This comment has been removed by the author.
Join the independent/hillary pledge by clicking here
What Hillary Clinton and the media are hiding from the voters
By Kathy Miller | The Hillary Project
To verify this case: you can go to http: www.lasuperiorcourt.org
While Senator Clinton is on the campaign trail telling reporters that the use of her opponents' 'bitter' remarks could damage Senator Obama's chances to win the general election if he should win the nomination, a California superior judge will soon be setting a trial date for the historic civil landmark case in Paul vs. Clinton.
Apparently the Clintons believe that the word 'bitter' is far more damaging than testify under oath in a civil fraud trial.
For some reason, the media doesn't think that a historic trial to haul a former President and a Presidential candidate to court for fraud is newsworthy.
A status conference hearing is scheduled for April 25, 2008, just three days after the Pennsylvania primary. California Superior Judge Aurelio N. Munoz is expected to finally set a trial date after delayment back in February.
Judge Munoz ruled back in February that Paul's legal team can begin seeking depositions from a host of big names – including Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton – that allegedly were witnesses to an effort by the Clintons and top Democratic leaders to extract millions of dollars from Paul in illegal donations and then cover it up. Discovery is expected to begin in May.
The Clintons have tried to dismiss the case, but the California Supreme Court, in 2004, upheld a lower-court decision to deny the motion.
The complaint says Bill Clinton promised to promote Paul's Internet entertainment company, Stan Lee Media, in exchange for stock, cash options and massive contributions to his wife's 2000 Senate campaign. Paul contends he was directed by the Clintons and Democratic Party leaders to produce, pay for and then join them in lying about footing the bill for an August 2000 Hollywood gala and fundraiser.
The Clintons' legal counsel has denied the former president made any deal with Paul. But Paul's attorney Colette Wilson has stated there are witnesses who say it was common knowledge at Stan Lee Media that Bill Clinton was preparing to be a rainmaker for the company after he left office.
Paul claims former Vice President Al Gore, former Democratic Party chairman Ed Rendell and Clinton presidential campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe also are among the people who can confirm Paul engaged in the deal.
The complaint also asserts that Senator Clinton filed four false reports to the FEC of Paul's donations in an attempt to distance herself from him after a Washington Post story days after the August 2000 fundraiser reported his past felony convictions. Clinton then returned a check for $2,000, insisting it was the only money she had taken from Paul. But one month later, she demanded another $100,000, to be hidden in a state committee using untraceable securities.
Senator Clinton was dismissed from the case as a defendant, but Munoz already has made it clear he won't accept any attempts to block Senator Clinton from serving as a material witness. The judge told Clinton's lawyer David Kendall: "Well, any opposition is probably going to be dead on arrival, if that will – if you understand what I'm saying, Mr. Kendall."
Paul has outlined the entire case in a one hour documentary entitled, Hillary Uncensored, Banned by the Media. Paul believes the Clintons have thwarted the media from exposing this story, and he has set up a website called PaulvClinton to expose and inform the public of the latest news and information himself in the trial.
Perhaps voters should be 'bitter' that this story is not being reported by the mainstream media.
You can sign up on the website PaulvClinton to receive e-mails of the news in the trial as it happens.
Note: Peter Paul has passed a lie detector's test to prove he is not lying about hiring Bill Clinton to be a rainmaker for his company. Do you think Hillary or Bill Clinton would pass a lie dectector's test?
Choose Civil - then Case Summary - type in the Case Number BC30417
PETER F PAUL VS WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON
Filing Date: 10/14/2003
obama said we should play by the rules and not change the rules in the middle of the game.
the rules say that superdelegates can vote for hillary even if most of the pledged delegates vote for obama.
Hillary Clinton
What do you think?
It appears that Hillary Clinton is continuing to campaign only because she wants to run as Vice President. Not with Barack Obama, but with John McCain. Think about how she's been conducting her campaign lately. She's running as if she is a republican candidate. What do you think about Hillary's strategy? Is she only running to be Vice President with John McCain, or is there another reason?
Post a Comment
<< Home